GRATUITOUS BOOB! SHOTS

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

DanElectro wrote:

google her,,,

meh....in most of the pics she looks like a girl with just sub par looks and huge jugs

so now a chick can become famous just because she has huge tits?.....

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

DanElectro wrote:

google her,,,

meh....in most of the pics she looks like a girl with just sub par looks and huge jugs

so now a chick can become famous just because she has huge tits?.....

Two words: Pamela Anderson

Figga wrote:

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

DanElectro wrote:

google her,,,

meh....in most of the pics she looks like a girl with just sub par looks and huge jugs

so now a chick can become famous just because she has huge tits?.....

Two words: Pamela Anderson

let me rephrase that..........

so now an ugly chick can become famous just because she has huge tits?.....





Pamela Anderson actually had some looks (whether they were natural or not) goin for her besides her rack, this chick is no fuckin Pamela Anderson.....no fucking way, not even on a good day

she looks a like a guy with big tits in this picture......which im sure is the next big thing

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

*someone hand this man a shamwow.

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

The reason paper bags were created.

doesn't look that bad.

Tim Radd wrote:

doesn't look that bad.

You only say that because her boobs offset her ugliness. You wouldn't be so kind she was flat-chested and had that face.











It's a double standard and you're an objectifying pig!

True Believer wrote:

Tim Radd wrote:

doesn't look that bad.

You only say that because her boobs offset her ugliness. You wouldn't be so kind she was flat-chested and had that face.











It's a double standard and you're an objectifying pig!

Neither one is bad looking. Not super hot but not bad either.

Mr.Wholesome wrote:

True Believer wrote:

Tim Radd wrote:

doesn't look that bad.

You only say that because her boobs offset her ugliness. You wouldn't be so kind she was flat-chested and had that face.











It's a double standard and you're an objectifying pig!

Neither one is bad looking. Not super hot but not bad either.

Their both "aight" but clearly one body is better than the other.

yea so stfu TB!!

Thomas wrote:

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

The reason paper bags were created.

I ouldn't touch either of them with my ten foot pole.

Sure you wouldn't joel sure you wouldn't

I don't know what you're all talking about since I still haven't looked at her face once...

CaptainJoel wrote:

Thomas wrote:

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

The reason paper bags were created.

I ouldn't touch either of them with my ten foot pole.

i wouldnt either

maybe after a few drinks id mess with the girl on the left, she has a cute face but she looks like she's probably 15

the other girl is just plain busted, ugly face, ratty hair, and besides a perfect rack her body has no curves, look at her hips!....she looks like a man, its a waste of a perfect set of tits if you ask me

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

CaptainJoel wrote:

Thomas wrote:

REEF aka Luke Cage wrote:

The reason paper bags were created.

I ouldn't touch either of them with my ten foot pole.

i wouldnt either

maybe after a few drinks id mess with the girl on the left, she has a cute face but she looks like she's probably 15

the other girl is just plain busted, ugly face, ratty hair, and besides a perfect rack her body has no curves, look at her hips!....she looks like a man, its a waste of a perfect set of tits if you ask me

alright, exhibit B, Judge Reef:

Wow Lois is looking great in this issue.

She looks exactly like every woman Ed Benes has ever drawn.

True Believer wrote:

She looks exactly like every woman Ed Benes has ever drawn.

You mean extremely hot?

Thomas wrote:

True Believer wrote:

She looks exactly like every woman Ed Benes has ever drawn.

You mean extremely hot?

Sure, but in the exact same way.

They're more or less interchangeable.

I may be being a bit harsh though.

Aesthetically it looks nice but there's untapped potential for variety in his style yet he deigns to use the same form for every character.

True Believer wrote:

Thomas wrote:

True Believer wrote:

She looks exactly like every woman Ed Benes has ever drawn.

You mean extremely hot?

Sure, but in the exact same way.

They're more or less interchangeable.

I may be being a bit harsh though.

Aesthetically it looks nice but there's untapped potential for variety in his style yet he deigns to use the same form for every character.

Well from an artist perspective I know how hard it is to get something to look just right, having something in slightly the wrong spot or slightly tilted can make the drawing look bad. I guess he finds it easier to work with what works.

DUDE!!!

...did that cop just cop a feel?!?!

woaw!